Archive for the ‘Governance’ Category

You Can’t be Creative If You Refuse to be Confused

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

by Rev. Joan Van Becelaere
Ohio-Meadville District Executive

Last week, I did something that I had been longing to do for some time. I saved my pennies (well…dimes and dollars) and spent a week at the Cape Cod Institute attending a class offered by Margaret Wheatley and Angela Blanchard, called “Leaders For The Storm: Wisdom Old and New for Leading in Crisis and Chaos.”

The presenters started off with a basic assertion that we live I n an age of anxiety, uncertainty, disillusionment and exhaustion. As well as an age of exploration, generosity and clarity. Kind of like the start to Dicken’s “Tale of Two Cities” – “ It was the worst of times. It was the best of times….”

But I have to admit – they struck a chord. It IS anxious and chaotic and exploratory and generous out there. There is a lot of change going on …constantly. And all of this stuff will and is impacting each and every one of us.

And then they said something that directly reflected the concerns I hear from congregational leaders every day — leadership has never been as difficult and perplexing as it is today.

The systems that created our modern state of crises, they said, cannot resolve the problems. New systems must be created to find our way to real workable solutions. Leaders are called upon to play two roles–hospice workers to the failed systems (to keep what is necessary still running) while trying to act as midwives to the birth of new ones (that will bring real solutions.).

Change is inevitable and the pace is picking up. Of course, this situation results in social and psychological chaos. This isn’t to be feared since ”you can’t be creative if you refuse to be confused.” You can’t find new solutions if you refuse to jump in and face the situation in all of its messiness and admit that you don’t know all of the answers. But it does call for changing some of our key beliefs about how the world works and our assumptions about how to lead and organize.

Our world currently operates with some basic assumptions that serve to hinder us in our attempts to deal with the world today.

1. Leaders have to maintain control and produce stability in the face of uncertainty. We don’t need creativity or experimentation. There is no room for the confusion or failure that comes with experiments.

2. That’s the way things are and we can’t change them. Disillusionment is the way of the world.

3. Only a select, few, gifted folk can be leaders. There aren’t enough leaders to go around.

4. We live in the midst of scarcity. There are not enough time, talent, ideas or resources to deal with our problems.

5. Other humans are inadequate and not be trusted. We have to find ways to control them from messing things up even more.

Counter to this rather dismal set of assumptions, we are called upon to foster new beliefs that will help us address our new world of creative chaos. Let me try to summarize these briefly albeit inadequately.

1. Chaos is the necessary route to creativity and newness. Experimentation is a blessing and failure is how we learn to succeed the next time. We have to let go of our futile and destructive search for certainty if we want to see new possibilities. We have to stop thinking that we know all of the answers if we are going to discover the new approaches that will be truly effective.

2. Every situation is workable. Maybe not immediately. Maybe not in the ways first expected. Life will always give you feedback that you can learn from. Whatever you do, you get a response. The worlds is always sending you messages. But we ignore this reality. We focus on the action to much we forget that feedback comes to us. We need to listen then ask …did the action work? Is the response what you expected? What do we learn from the feedback?

3. Leaders are made (or can be taught) not born. Most leaders want to believe the leadership is a special quality only available to them — and a few of their friends. But there is a better definition of leadership — a leader is anyone who is willing to help, anyone who sees something that needs to be changed and steps forward to take on the challenge. Most of us can be leaders on behalf of something we care about. The true role of a leader today is to set the stage so other leaders can emerge.

4. We have what we need. This is where paying attention to the diversity around us helps us see more options. After all, no one person can see the world in all of its fullness. There are untapped, unrealized resources in people and cultures and traditions right in front of us. Leaders help others discover their own potential and creativity and skills and calling to lead. One very powerful example – we label folk as ‘poor’ and assume they are entirely helpless, not recognizing or trying to draw on the skills and creativity and knowledge they have that can be used to address their situation.

5. The human spirit can not be extinguished. We have to learn to trust one another and create new connections across all of our former boundaries. We have learn to act from our own sense of generosity, not fear. Generosity is a matter of the human heart operating in the world without fear.

I m just now beginning to unpack what these assumptions might mean for my ministry and work with congregations and the Ohio-Meadville district. It will be an exciting year.

Margaret Wheatley has a new book out that was written for these times: “Perseverance.” I really recommend it.

And I WILL get a t-shirt that says: “You can’t be creative if you refuse to be confused.”

So What Happened at GA?

Monday, June 28th, 2010

General Assembly is now over until we meet in Charlotte, NC next year. Much happened at GA this year and if you were not able to attend, I strongly encourage you to visit the UUA’s GA website and find out what happened. You can watch video of the Opening and Closing Ceremonies, Service of the Living Tradition, Ware Lecture with Winnoa LaDuke, and all the plenaries. You can also view a selection of the workshops presented on Thursday and Friday. You can find this information at http://www.uua.org/events/generalassembly/2010/index.shtml

I will very quickly tell you that the following actions occurred and you can find details and final language at the UUA website:

  • The Statement of Conscience on Peacemaking was passed
  • The Study Action Issue on Immigration Reform was selected for study for the next 4 years by our congregations.
  • Three Actions of Immediate Witness were approved on a response to SB1070 in Arizona, Gulf Coast Environmental and Economic Justice and Clean Up the Clean Energy Bill.
  • The GA mini-assembly crafted a compromise on the Arizona position. We will be in Phoenix in 2012 for a Justice General Assembly with minimal business to be conducted and the focus to be learning and working with our partners.
  • The election process of the president and the moderator were changed and their terms where changed to one 6 year term instead of two 4 year terms.

UU World blogged about the happenings of GA as well as uploading a number of photos. You can read the headlines, the GA blog and view the photos at their website. You can find other GA blogs to read the GA website blog page.

You will be hearing more about what happened at GA and we’ll be providing you with more information over the next few months.

Beth C

Updates on GA News

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

Last week we posted links to various groups and UU World articles about the debate on whether or not to move the 2012 General Assembly out of Phoenix, AZ. Since that blog was written, DRUUMM has changed it’s position. To read about this change, please view the UU World coverage at http://www.uuworld.org/news/articles/167177.shtml

To review what we posted last week, please read the blog below.

Beth C

Some Thoughts About Governance

Friday, April 16th, 2010

Once upon a time, there was a small congregation.  The leaders of the congregation, which consisted primarily of the Board of Trustees, made all the decisions that impacted on the day to day lives of the members of the congregation.  When members had questions, they asked them of the Board.  When members had problems, they brought them to the Board.  As the congregation grew larger, they hired themselves a full time Minister.  But the job of the Minister was to tend to the spiritual needs of the congregants and to lead them in joyful worship.  The day to day running of the congregation still fell to those who served on the Board.

More and more people began hearing about this wonderful congregation and the numbers of visitors and members began to increase substantially.  Now additional staff had to be hired and committees formed to take on the added work of this larger congregation.  But still, the day to day decisions rested in the hands of the Board of Trustees and people in the congregation who wanted something done came to them for answers and solutions.

But the questions were too numerous and the problems too complex for the Board to keep up with them.  Decisions were delayed, communication throughout the congregation was difficult and conflict was on the rise.  The Board of Trustees, in an effort to stem this menacing tide, tried to work harder to answer the questions and solve the problems.  Eventually, they said “enough”.  They were burned out.  They couldn’t keep up this pace any longer.  They had lost their enthusiasm, their excitement at being leaders in the congregation.  They decided it was time to let someone else lead the congregation.  But no one in the congregation wanted to serve on the Board.  They were aware of the stress that their leaders were under and the inordinate amount of time that they were spending in the performance of their duties.  So this little congregation that had enjoyed so much growth and success suddenly found itself in crisis; there was a great void in leadership.  There was no one to steer the ship.  Eventually, the congregation hit an iceberg, sank, and was never heard from again.  The End.

Okay, so I’m not good with happy endings…or, for that matter, consistent metaphors.  But the moral of the story is this:  A congregation, whose governance process does not keep pace with its growth in numbers, vitality and significance, will collapse under its own weight.  As more members become involved and the work of the congregation becomes more complex, more people need to be brought into the governing process.      The Board of Trustees can no longer do it all itself.  Staff members must be trusted to take on more of the day-to-day decisions.  Committees should be empowered to take action more independently.  Questions and problems need to be addressed with people and groups in the congregation better equipped to give timely answers and informed advice.

The job of the Board of Trustees becomes more visionary.  Efforts are directed at setting policies and procedures, creating a vision, ensuring that the congregation is moving in a direction that is consistent with its mission.  In this scenario, Board members become inspired, energized and confident in their role as stewards of the congregation.

The governance process in our congregations must be as fluid and ready to change as any other component in our on-going efforts to grow and to become stronger and more vital congregations.  In so doing, we help to create our own happy endings.

What do you think?

Mark Bernstein, Shared Growth Consultant